Crucibles and their lids are made of materials resistant to high temperatures, usually porcelain or an inert metal. Ceramics such as alumina, zirconia, and especially magnesia will tolerate the highest temperatures. One of the first metals used in crucible production was platinum; more recently, metals such as nickel and zirconium have also been used. The type of crucible used for thermoanalytical measurements can have a strong influence on the measurement results obtained. Additionally, the crucible can also influence the characteristics of the instrument’s measuring cell.
The measurements shown here on indium in Al, Pt, stainless steel and Al2O3 crucibles clearly demonstrate that both the thermal conductivity and the mass of the crucible have an effect on the DSC and DTA peak shape.
The calibration procedures take these effects into consideration and eliminate the influence of the crucible material on the measurement results.
The DSC crucible should have a flat bottom and be made of a material with a high thermal conductivity. This guarantees optimum heat transfer and low temperature gradients between the sample, crucible and sensor.
The crucible should be made of an inert material in order to prevent reactions with the sample in the programmed temperature range. Exceptions are crucibles for which a catalytic effect on the sample is desired (e.g., copper crucible for OIT tests, etc.).
The crucible should not exhibit anyphase transitions or other effects in the programmed temperature range; the melting point or fusion temperature must exceed the maximum application temperature to a sufficient degree.
The dimension, shape and specific heat of the crucible should be optimized to achieve and/or maintain the highest caloric sensitivity and lowest time constant for the measuring system. Optimized parameters will result in sharp, well-defined and clearly separated peaks.
Crucibles should be reusable, especially special ones for specific applications.